ok , today I'm gonna talk about proofs for existence of God !
look at this quote from epicurus :
" Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
"Then why call him God?
and also this one again from epicurus :
"What is good is what is pleasurable, and what is bad is what is painful. If pain is chosen over pleasure in some cases it is only because it leads to a greater pleasure "
so I am wondering why he couldn't just modify the first quote about god like this :
" God is willing to prevent evil , and able to do so , but not completely "
but why ?? because according to second quotation from epicurus he chosen some pain over pleasure just for a greater pleasure . God could have chosen no-pain no-pleasure , but he chose the second one , it is fair , isn,t it ??
the all above mentioned conclusions are just a possibility and does not prove the god itself , but if we can somehow prove the god then the above description of god turns out to be true . but only "if" we can !